I never bothered looking for the hard-strap resistors since a BIOS mod was sufficient. I will write a crash course on modding, but finding time to put all the info together and then test it by following my own instructions has been somewhat difficult recently.
If your kernels work well on Fermi chips, and you are not particularly limited by the amount of RAM on the card you may find that a modified GTX C works better for you - unlike later cards, that has a bidirectional async DMA engine.
I guess it depends on whether you are more limited by the amount of RAM on the card 1. In terms of raw number crunching power, GTX and are similar enough for it not too matter too much vs shaders isn't that big a deal. The monitor gets recognized, but no modes work via DP - always just a blank screen.
It is really most bizzare that this happens only in a VM and not on bare metal. I haven't done any modifications to my GTX yet so I don't know yet whether that will suffer from the same issue. Hi Gordan Thanks for the reply I tried searching for Gainward card to buy, but I cannot seem to find any.
Thanks a bunch for offering to even modify the BIOS for me. That would be great. My K20 has 5GB right now, and I find myself maxing it quite often run a lot of mesh cells in my simulation software , so I would rather get a card with as much memory as possible. I would go for a GTX to get two Ms , but they are a little expensive for my experiment. The hard part is how to get this done. Do all GTXs follow the reference design, or are some brands better than others at modding?
Your help in getting me started is much appreciated. By the way, I do not need the display to work with this card as I have separate Quadro card for that. Thanks once again. Following the reference design is irrelevant for soft-mods. Modifying the boot string and the board ID string is optional but I'm pretty sure these are just human readable fields that don't actually do anything of consequence.
Checking my various notes, there are at least 32 bits in the strap a whopping half! I never counted them before! If I'm reading my notes right and I really hope I am , the bits that bricked the card include 16,17 and Perhaps I should re-test the bits that didn't brick the card for other potential functionality such as enabling stereo 3D functionality or ECC. I would rather solder resistors. I would not really need 3D functionality or anything fancy. This is strictly numbers crunching. Or, a guide for multiple cards.
Yes the gpu has ecc end to end but the ram is just soft-ecc, it takes a bit so the quadro goes down to 5.
Remember the old core 2 xeon's did not have FSB parity - the memory controller did the parity. However the odd bird is my mac pro which uses the x58 chipset can run with or without parity even though the cpu xeon is parity only. It is just taking 1 bit out of regular ram. Which makes sense since parity ram in regular motherboards is just another chip. I suspect geforce cards just have it disabled.
The rom if you think about it bios tells the system about the card, and does basic functions during boot but also functions to configure the GPU. I was trying to think of where you might find such beta cards, or if they are all destroyed? That would be the key. Some idiot sold me a raid controller with pre-release firmware didn't bother to flash it and it did not behave like the production board, it was running too hot and was even faster than the production model. Locally-deformable PRT Bat.
Hugely better lighting effects. Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting Teapot. Hugely better reflection handling. MRender Avg. Render target array GShader Sphere. Hugely faster multi rendering. Gravity Avg. NBody particle system Galaxy. Hugely faster NBody calculation. Hugely better peak lighting effects. Reflection High dynamic range lighting Teapot. Hugely better peak reflection handling. Hugely faster peak multi rendering. Gravity NBody particle system Galaxy.
Hugely faster peak NBody calculation. Market Share Market Share trailing 30 days. Age Newest. It does make a modest difference in memory performance. Hey CudaaduC nice peace of information indeed…have not been aware that TitanX was fully supported for TCC… cool move thx nvidia…checked and works fine…but does not solve my little use case…I really need to get the IDs changed to run the tests i am trying to run.
What i need to achieve is Windows detecting the device as Quadro…. So I tried the m straps from jofo and it worked, but I would prefer to change the device id back to and get my card running as a normal gtx Can anyone help?
Hi Please, somebody help me. Will I can adjust clocks and fans? It seems that gaming cards such as GTX do not have increased dp performance. Are you sure that nvidia advertised such a feature in GTX? The point is I found no official statement that the gaming cards have reduced dp performance - they use the fermi chip, the same as the Tesla and the Quadro Cards will use.
And the architecture of the fermi chip allows for double precision performance at half speed of single precision. So it is never a question of whether the tesla cards have increased DP performance but if the consumer cards have a reduced one.
If they have less DP Performance than the Tesla cards, this will be because its either disabled through drivers or some kind of hardware jumper. Soooo … tmurray any comment?? Was this decision made to discourage the use of these products for professional use where Quadro and Tesla are targeted? Considering the fused support of single- and double-precision calculations in the CUDA cores, how was this change even applied? A: Yes, full-speed double precision performance is a feature we reserve for our professional customers.
0コメント